legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Ashley H.

In re Ashley H.
06:27:2006

In re Ashley H.


Filed 6/26/06 In re Ashley H. CA4/2


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS








California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.








IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO















In re ASHLEY H., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.




SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JEFFREY H.,


Defendant and Appellant.



E039361


(Super.Ct.No. J195539)


OPINION



APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Deborah Daniel, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.


Konrad S. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


Dennis E. Wagner, Interim County Counsel, Phebe W. Chu and Julie J. Surber, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Michael D. Randall, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.


Jeffrey H. (Father) is the father of six-year-old Ashley H. Father appeals from an order terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)[1] On appeal, he contends (1) the juvenile court violated his due process rights when it failed to issue a temporary removal order on his behalf to attend the section 366.26 hearing; (2) the juvenile court erred in finding he was provided with reasonable reunification services; (3) his challenge to the juvenile court's orders terminating his reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing have not been forfeited; and (4) the findings and orders at the section 366.26 hearing were corrupted by the juvenile court's unsupported finding that he was provided with reasonable reunification services. As explained below, we reject Father's contentions and affirm the judgment.


I


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


In 1990, Father and F.H. (Mother) met in a drug rehabilitation center and began living together. In February 2000, Ashley was born, and approximately one year later Father and Mother married. Father and Mother shared a history of drug abuse and domestic violence, and Father had an extensive criminal record.


On September 19, 2003, Father and Mother â€





Description A decision regarding terminating parental rights.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale