P. v. White
Filed 6/28/06 P. v. White CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Butte)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARLES MARION WHITE, Defendant and Appellant. |
C051590
(Super. Ct. No. CM022726)
|
In exchange for a promise that he would not be sentenced to state prison at the outset, defendant Charles Marion White entered a negotiated plea of no contest to being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, being a convicted felon in possession of ammunition, and unlawfully exhibiting a weapon, a misdemeanor. In accordance with the plea agreement, the court suspended imposition of sentence and granted defendant probation, subject to certain terms and conditions, including he serve 365 days in jail with presentence custody credit of 174 days.
Defendant appeals, and we appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks us to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
SCOTLAND , P.J.
We concur:
NICHOLSON , J.
RAYE , J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Real Estate Attorney.
