legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PACIFIC CAISSON & SHORING, INC v. BERNARDS BROS. INC

PACIFIC CAISSON & SHORING, INC v. BERNARDS BROS. INC
06:12:2011

PACIFIC CAISSON & SHORING, INC

PACIFIC CAISSON & SHORING, INC v. BERNARDS BROS. INC













Filed 3/3/11






CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE


PACIFIC CAISSON & SHORING, INC.,

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant,

v.

BERNARDS BROS. INC.,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

B219199

(Los Angeles County
Super. Ct. No. BC343834)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John T. Shook, Judge. Reversed and remanded.
Law Offices of Arthur Jarvis Cohen and Arthur Jarvis Cohen for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.
Law Offices of Ted R. Gropman and Ted R. Gropman; Benedon & Serlin, Douglas G. Benedon and Gerald M. Serlin for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

INTRODUCTION
Subcontrator Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. (Pacific) sued its general contractor Bernards Bros. Inc. (Bernards) seeking payment for work performed under Pacific's subcontract. The trial court granted Bernards' motion for judgment, ruling, because Pacific did not maintain a Class C‑12 specialty license, that it was not â€




Description Subcontrator Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. (Pacific) sued its general contractor Bernards Bros. Inc. (Bernards) seeking payment for work performed under Pacific's subcontract. The trial court granted Bernards' motion for judgment, ruling, because Pacific did not maintain a Class C‑12 specialty license, that it was not â€
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale