legal news


Register | Forgot Password

SOUTH SUTTER v. LJ SUTTER PARTNERS Part-III

SOUTH SUTTER v. LJ SUTTER PARTNERS Part-III
06:12:2011

SOUTH SUTTER v

SOUTH SUTTER v. LJ SUTTER PARTNERS









Filed 3/16/11




CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sutter)
----

SOUTH SUTTER, LLC,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

LJ SUTTER PARTNERS, L.P., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

C058206

(Super. Ct. No.
CV-CS-07-2068)


SOUTH SUTTER, LLC,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

ANDERSON WEST, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.


C059554

(Super. Ct. No.
CV-CS-07-2068)



STORY CONTINUE FROM PART II….


A. Standard of review
Subdivision (b)(1) of section 425.16 sets forth the elements of an anti-SLAPP motion. It provides: â€




Description Plaintiff in these actions, South Sutter, LLC (South Sutter), owned an option to acquire a large tract of land from defendant Odysseus Farms. South Sutter claimed the option agreement also gave it an exclusive interest in other lands owned by Odysseus Farms and a right of first refusal should Odysseus Farms acquire additional property and enter into a joint venture with third parties regarding the new property.
When Odysseus Farms entered into an agreement with defendant LJ Sutter Partners, L.P. (LJ Sutter), optioning its other lands, and when Odysseus Farms allegedly formed a joint venture with defendant Anderson West, LLC, regarding new property it had acquired, South Sutter sued. It alleged contract and tort causes of action.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale