legal news


Register | Forgot Password

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY v. JOHN M. REA Part II

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY v. JOHN M. REA Part II
06:29:2006

SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY v. JOHN M. REA






Filed 6/28/06




CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT














SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JOHN M. REA, as Director, etc. et al.,


Defendants and Appellants;



H028841


(Santa Clara County


Super. Ct. No. 1-03-CV006149)



AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 101, AFL-CIO,


Real Party in Interest and Appellant.




Story continue from Part I ……..


A. Sections 100308 and 100309


Sections 100308 and 100309 were part of the 1994 reorganizing legislation (Stats. 1994, ch. 254, §§ 27, 28, pp. 1855-1856). Section 100308 describes the employees who would be transferring to VTA and VTA's obligations pertaining to accrued benefits: â€





Description A decision regarding "whether state law requires the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to bargain with a certain labor union when the bargaining unit the union represents includes supervisory and management personnel".
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale