Jennings v. Cox
Filed 11/28/05 Jennings v. Cox CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Shasta)
----
CHRISTOPHER DAVID JENNINGS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ROBERT E. COX, Defendant and Appellant. | C049093
(Super. Ct. No. 0152218)
|
In this judgment roll appeal, defendant Robert E. Cox appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to set aside a protective order issued in favor of plaintiff Christopher David Jennings. We shall affirm the judgment (order).
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Jennings and Cox are both engaged in the purchase and sale of antiques and collectibles.
In August 2004, Jennings petitioned for an injunction prohibiting Cox from harassing him or his wife. Jennings alleged Cox (1) threatened him when Jennings bought some items from Cox in an antique mall in Pleasanton, and (2) later â€
Description | A decision regarding setting aside a protective order. |
Rating |