P. v. Lawlor
Filed 6/29/06 P. v. Lawlor CA2/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRUCE E. LAWLOR, Defendant and Appellant. | B178665 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA063590) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,
Allen J. Webster, Jr., Judge. Affirmed.
Danalynn Pritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Laura J. Hartquist, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________________
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Bruce Lawlor was convicted of manufacturing and possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, and possession of a firearm by a felon. Lawlor was sentenced to a prison term of eight years, eight months.
Lawlor appealed his convictions to this court. In an unpublished opinion, we affirmed in part and reversed in part. (People v. Lawlor, B160704, filed April 30, 2004.)[1] We concluded the trial court had erred by finding Lawlor lacked â€
