legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Johnson v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

Johnson v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
06:30:2006

Johnson v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory



Filed 6/29/06 Johnson v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory CA1/3




NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.







IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE










KEVIN JOHNSON,


Plaintiff and Appellant,


v.


LAWRENCE BERKELEY LABORATORY et al.,


Defendants and Respondents.



A108556


(Alameda County


Super. Ct. No. 2002057093)



Kevin Johnson appeals from dismissal of his complaint alleging race discrimination against his employer, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California (LBNL).[1] He contends summary judgment was improper because he raised a material issue of fact that he suffered an adverse employment action when, for pretextual reasons, he received merely a satisfactory, as opposed to a more favorable, rating on his annual performance evaluation. We affirm.


FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


The plaintiff is African-American. In December 1999 he was hired as a firefighter by LBNL, on the recommendation of Fire Chief Stacy Cox.[2] Plaintiff's 2000/2001 annual performance evaluation that he claims was discriminatory was initially done by Chief Cox, shortly before Cox's retirement.[3] Cox gave plaintiff an overall rating of â€





Description A decision regarding race discrimination by the employer.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale