BDBG Promotions, Inc. v. The Eleanor Group
Filed 11/28/05 BDBG Promotions, Inc. v. The Eleanor Group CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
BDBG PROMOTIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE ELEANOR GROUP et al., Defendants and Appellants. | B177752 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC 316920) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ralph Dau, Judge. Affirmed.
Kramer & Kaslow, Philip A. Kramer, and James D. Henderson, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants.
Lon B. Isaacson Associates, Lon B. Isaacson, and Larry Johnson for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
* * * * * *
Appellants Crystal Mattson, Rebecca Harrell and Jennifer Cusentino appeal from an order denying their petition to compel arbitration with respondents BDBG Promotions, Inc., and Elizabeth Martin. We affirm.
FACTS
On June 11, 2004, respondents filed an action, which named appellants[1] and Lisa Donovan, Jen Dede and Deanne Wright as defendants. Donovan, Dede and Wright are not parties to this appeal. The complaint alleges that BDBG Promotions, Inc., sells promotional packages for salons and day spas and that respondent Martin is the sole owner of BDBG.
The complaint alleges that appellants Harrell and Mattson started working for BDBG in February 2004. Harrell and Mattson signed employment agreements under which they agreed to keep BDBG's trade secrets confidential, and undertook not to compete with BDBG. The only other signatory to the employment agreements is â€
Description | A decision regarding compelling arbitration. |
Rating |