legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ Part III

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ Part III
07:05:2006

BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. v. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ





Filed 6/29/06





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





BIG CREEK LUMBER CO. et al., )


)


Plaintiffs and Appellants, )


) S123659


v. )


) Ct. App. 6 H023778


COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ et al., )


) Santa Cruz County Super. Ct.


Defendants and Appellants. ) Nos. CV134816 & CV137992


_______________________________________ )


Story continue from Part II …….



In sum, plaintiffs have not identified a clear statement by the Legislature of an intent, when enacting the FPA, to preempt traditional local zoning authority over the location of timber operations. Accordingly, and for all the foregoing reasons, we conclude, as did the Court of Appeal in Big Creek v. San Mateo, that â€





Description County's zoning ordinances restricting timber harvesting to specified zone districts and limiting the parcels on which helicopter operations associated with such harvesting can occur are not preempted by state forestry acts.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale