In re Anthony G.
Filed 7/5/06 In re Anthony G. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| In re ANTHONY G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY G., Defendant and Appellant. | E039180 (Super.Ct.No. SWJ004999) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. H. Dennis Myers, Judge. Affirmed.
Dabney B. Finch, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
The minor was charged in an amended petition with attempted carjacking in violation of Penal Code section 664/215,[1] robbery in violation of section 211 and use of a firearm. The court found the allegations to be true. The minor was committed to the California Youth Authority for a period of 13 years.
The minor appealed and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and requesting this court undertake a review of the entire record.
We have invited the minor to file a supplemental brief, which he has not done.
We have completed our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
HOLLENHORST
J.
We concur:
RAMIREZ
P.J.
MCKINSTER
J.
Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Escondido Real Estate Lawyers.
[1] All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
