legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Sanders

P. v. Sanders
07:12:2006

P. v. Sanders


Filed 7/11/06 P. v. Sanders CA1/5


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.







IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


RICKY RENEE SANDERS et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.





A105385



(Alameda County


Super. Ct. No. C144018)




Ricky Renee Sanders and Ceariaco Cabrellis took over a Cambridge Soundworks store in Berkeley, held the employees at gunpoint, robbed them, and removed a truckload of equipment. Both defendants appeal their convictions.


Procedural Background


A jury found defendants Ricky Sanders and Ceariaco Cabrellis guilty of one count of second degree commercial burglary (Penal Code § 459[1]); two counts of second degree robbery (§ 211); two counts of false imprisonment (§ 236); two counts of attempting to dissuade a witness (§ 136.1, subd. (b)(2)); and one count of cutting a utility line (§ 591). The jury also found several enhancements true.


The trial court sentenced Sanders to nine years eight months in prison and sentenced Cabrellis to 14 years four months.


Factual Background


Prosecution Case


At around 11:40 a.m. on Sunday September 15, 2002, David Divjak arrived at his place of work, Cambridge Soundworks in Berkeley. He looked out a window in the bathroom at the back of the store and noticed a U-Haul truck being backed into a parking space in the alley behind the store. At trial, Divjak identified defendant Sanders as the driver of the truck.


Ryan Antonelli, another employee, joined Divjak at the store. After a little while a young man entered the store carrying a gun. The gunman led Divjak and Antonelli to the rear bathroom and took their wallets. He said he was taking the wallets so that he would know who they were and where they lived. He forced them to the floor and tied Antonelli's hands behind his back with plastic ties. A second man entered the bathroom and tied Divjak's hands. The second man said, â€





Description A decision regarding second degree commercial burglary, second degree robbery, false imprisonment and attempting to dissuade a witness and cutting a utility line.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale