legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Miller

In re Miller
07:18:2006

In re Miller




Filed 7/17/06 In re Miller CA2/4







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS







California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FOUR










In re


DONALD MILLER,


On Habeas Corpus.



B186447


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BH003138)



APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a petition for Habeas Corpus, David S. Wesley, Judge. Reversed.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, James M. Humes, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Frances T. Grunder, Assistant Attorney General, Michelle Des Jardins, Heather Bushman and Lora Fox Martin, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.


Roger S. Hanson for Petitioner.


The Board of Parole Hearings (formerly known as the Board of Prison Terms, and hereafter referred to as â€





Description A decision regarding writ of petition for habeas corpus.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale