Gilman v. Babich
Filed 7/18/06 Gilman v. Babich CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
| KEVAN H. GILMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOSEPH J. BABICH et al., Defendants and Respondents. |
C050902
(Super. Ct. No. 04AS03137)
|
Plaintiff Kevan H. Gilman filed a lawsuit against Attorney Joseph Babich and the law firm of Dreyer, Babich, Buccola & Callaham, LLP (the firm), alleging breach of contract and other causes of action. The trial court entered summary judgment in defendants' favor and ordered plaintiff to pay defendants' attorney fees and costs in accordance with the attorney fee clause in the contract. (Civ. Code, § 1717, subd. (a).)
Plaintiff appeals. His sole contention is that defendants were not entitled to an attorney fee and costs award because they effectively â€
