legal news


Register | Forgot Password

JOE ABOUAB v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Part III

JOE ABOUAB v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Part III
07:25:2006

JOE ABOUAB v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO




Filed 7/20/06




CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO










JOE ABOUAB et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al.,


Defendants and Respondents.



A110940


(San Francisco County


Super. Ct. No. 946445)



Story continue from Part II ….


And, given that the defendant was a public entity, the Supreme Court â€





Description Where plaintiffs filed mandamus action against city seeking to compel it to investigate an unreported change in ownership of property and reassess it for property tax purposes, which suit was a catalyst to city action resulting in great increase in property tax revenue, but plaintiffs did not prevail in writ action, plaintiffs were not entitled to recover attorney fees where, prior to filing writ action, plaintiffs gave no notice to city of their intent to file suit, did not disclose location of property to city or grounds for finding an ownership change, and did not attempt to settle the matter short of litigation.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale