legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Aranda

P. v. Aranda
07:27:2006

P. v. Aranda



Filed 7/26/06 P. v. Aranda CA6







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


SALVADOR ARANDA,


Defendant and Appellant.



H028745


(Santa Clara County


Super. Ct. No. CC444788)



Defendant Salvador Aranda was convicted by jury of one count of failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of moving (Pen. Code,[1] § 290, subd. (a)(1)(A), count 1) and one count of failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of his birthday (§ 290, subd. (a)(1)(D), count 2). In a bifurcated proceeding, the jury found true allegations that defendant had suffered three serious prior felony convictions within the meaning of the Three Strikes Law (§§ 667, subd. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subd. (a)-(d)) and five prison priors (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). After denying defendant's Romero[2] motion, the court sentenced defendant to 25 years to life on the first count, consecutive to five one-year terms imposed because of the prison priors. The court imposed the same sentence on the second count and ordered that it run concurrent to the sentence on count 1 because both registration offenses â€





Description A decision regarding failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of moving and failing to register as a sex offender within five working days of his birthday.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale