P. v. Blackwell
Filed 3/6/06 P. v. Blackwell CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ANTHONY M. BLACKWELL,
Defendant and Appellant.
| C047701
(Super. Ct. No. 03F07408)
|
Defendant appeals his two convictions for attempted robbery. (Pen. Code,[1] §§ 664, 211.)[2] He contends there is insufficient evidence to support his two attempted robbery convictions. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Antonio and Gerardo Moreno and their nephew, Ruben, were doing landscaping work at a neighbor's house. While they were taking a break, codefendant Bridget Coilton and another woman drove up to the house in a gray Toyota Corolla and offered the Morenos sex for money. The Morenos declined the offer, and one of the women asked Gerardo for $5. Gerardo again refused, but said he would treat them to a beer. The women and Gerardo went to the store and Gerardo bought them beer.
The trio returned to the house and again the women sexually propositioned the Morenos. The Morenos again declined the offer, but one of the women who was sitting on Antonio's lap grabbed his back pocket which contained $350 folded over. Antonio refused to give the women the money, as it was for the landscaping job they were doing. The women left the house, and Antonio thought they were angry when they left, as they slammed the door of the car.
Coilton, Tasheba Shon't Watkins, and defendant's sister were residents of the same apartment complex. Watkins considered Coilton a good friend. Coilton and defendant also â€
