legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Shane A.

In re Shane A.
08:02:2006

In re Shane A.




Filed 7/31/06 In re Shane A. CA4/2






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS







California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO















In re SHANE A. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.




SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


BARBARA A. et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.



E039889


(Super.Ct.No. J197510)


OPINION



APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Deborah Daniel, Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.


Diana W. Prince, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant, William A.


Andrea St. Julian, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant, Barbara A.


Dennis E. Wagner, Interim County Counsel, and P. Joanne Fenton, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Valerie Lankford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.


1. Introduction


William A. (father) and Barbara A. (mother) are the parents of Shane and Kaylee A., dependent children of the juvenile court. The parents contend that the juvenile court erred in terminating their parental rights; they argue that the court erred in failing to find that they had such a beneficial relationship with the children that it would be detrimental to terminate their parental rights. Father raises the additional contention that he did not receive proper notice of the selection and implementation hearing, at which his parental rights were terminated. We affirm.


2. Factual and Procedural Background


In May 2004, the children came to the attention of the San Diego County Children's Services agency, when neighbors of the family in an apartment complex reported that the parents were verbally abusive toward the children, verbally and physically abusive toward one another, and neglectful of the children (e.g., three-year-old Shane was observed playing outside without any supervision). The parents also appeared to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. On May 11, 2004, police had responded to the apartment after reports of domestic violence. Mother had a bloody nose. Police officers observed drug paraphernalia (â€





Description The parents contend that the juvenile court erred in terminating their parental rights; they argue that the court erred in failing to find that they had such a beneficial relationship with the children that it would be detrimental to terminate their parental rights. Father raises the additional contention that he did not receive proper notice of the selection and implementation hearing, at which his parental rights were terminated. Court affirm the decision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale