legal news


Register | Forgot Password

DORE v. ARNOLD WORLDWIDE, INC

DORE v. ARNOLD WORLDWIDE, INC
08:04:2006

DORE v. ARNOLD WORLDWIDE, INC




Filed 8/3/06




IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





BROOK DORE, )


)


Plaintiff and Appellant, )


) S124494


v. )


) Ct.App. 2/7 B162235


ARNOLD WORLDWIDE, INC., et al., )


) Los Angeles County


Defendants and Respondents. ) Super. Ct. No. BC260637


__________________________________ )



Plaintiff alleges against his former employer various causes of action in connection with his termination. The trial court granted the employer summary judgment, but the Court of Appeal reversed. We agree with the trial court and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.


Background


Plaintiff Brook Dore was employed with an advertising agency in Colorado as a regional account director specializing in automobile accounts. In late 1998, Dore discussed with his employer the possibility of relocating to the employer's Los Angeles office.


In 1999, Dore learned that a management supervisor position was available in the Los Angeles office of defendant Arnold Worldwide, Inc., formerly known as Arnold Communications, Inc., (hereafter AWI). Dore interviewed with several AWI officers and employees. According to Dore, he was never told during the interview process that his employment would be terminable without cause or â€





Description Employment contract providing that employment was at will and could be terminated at any time was not ambiguous and meant employment could be terminated at any time with or without cause.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale