Cammon v. Rialto Unif. School Dist.
sFiled 8/2/06 Cammon v. Rialto Unif. School Dist. CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THEDA CAMMON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RIALTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. | E038887 (Super.Ct.No. SCVSS 123322) OPINION |
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. John H. Leahy, Judge. (Retired judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6, of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.
Theda Cammon, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Law Offices of Dennis J. Walsh and Dennis J. Walsh for Defendant and Respondent.
1. Introduction
Theda Cammon, plaintiff in propria persona, filed a complaint under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) against the Rialto Unified School District (hereafter â€
