legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Boyd

P. v. Boyd
08:10:2006

P. v. Boyd



Filed 8/9/06 P. v. Boyd CA4/2






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS






California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO











THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


ROBERT JAMES BOYD,


Defendant and Appellant.



E039511


(Super.Ct.No. FMB006128)


OPINION



APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Marsha G. Slough, Judge. Affirmed.


Howard C. Cohen, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


On October 21, 2005, defendant Robert James Boyd pled guilty to counts 3 through 9 of the third amended information and admitted the multiple victim enhancement as to count 3 and the great bodily injury enhancements as to 5 through 9.


In accordance with the negotiated plea bargain, defendant was sentenced to a total of 22 years and 4 months in state prison and awarded a total of 1,063 days of custody credits. The remaining counts and allegations were dismissed and stricken pursuant to the plea bargain and Penal Code section 1385.


Defendant appealed and, upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493], setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the facts. The brief requests that this court undertake a review of the entire record on appeal.


We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.


We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find not arguable issues.


The judgment is affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


/s/ RAMIREZ


P.J.


We concur:


/s/ GAUT


J.


/s/ KING


J.


Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.


Analysis and review provided by Poway Real Estate Attorney.





Description Defendant appealed and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende, setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the facts. The brief requests that this court undertake a review of the entire record on appeal
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale