legal news


Register | Forgot Password

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. SHANNON NICHOLS Part II

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. SHANNON NICHOLS Part II
08:11:2006

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY vs. SHANNON NICHOLS




Supreme Court of Florida




____________



No. SC03-1483


____________



STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,


Petitioner,



vs.



SHANNON NICHOLS,


Respondent.


____________



No. SC03-1653


____________



SHANNON NICHOLS,


Petitioner,



vs.



STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,


Respondent.



[June 1, 2006]


Story continue from Part I ……….


We recognize that the PIP statute is unique. It expressly abolished a traditional common-law right by limiting the recovery available to car accident victims. In exchange, the statute made PIP insurance compulsory and allowed recovery regardless of fault. As we have noted, â€





Description Court recognize that the PIP statute is unique. It expressly abolished a traditional common-law right by limiting the recovery available to car accident victims. In exchange, the statute made PIP insurance compulsory and allowed recovery regardless of fault.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale