G.R. v. Palmdale School Dist. Bd. of Trustees
Filed 8/14/06 G.R. v. Palmdale School Dist. Bd. of Trustees CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
| G.R., a minor, through his Guardian Ad Litem, RHONDA R., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE PALMDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B183982 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MS003708) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Alan S. Rosenfield, Judge. Affirmed.
Kosnett & Durchfort and James V. Kosnett for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Law Offices of Dennis J. Walsh, Stephan Birgel, Dennis J. Walsh and Thomas Laszlo Dorogi for Defendants and Respondents.
Petitioner G.R., a fifth grader in the Palmdale School District, made a sexually harassing statement about a female classmate, and the District suspended him from school for three days. Through his mother and guardian ad litem, Rhonda R., he filed a petition for writ of mandate against the District, seeking to expunge the suspension from his school records.[1] The trial court denied the petition. Petitioner appeals, and we affirm.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In January 2002, petitioner was a fifth grade student at Ana Verde Plaza School in the Palmdale School District. He had a lengthy disciplinary history (11 documented incidents) that began in September 1998. The incidents included telling a female student she had a â€
