P. v. Wright

Filed 8/14/06 P. v. Wright CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

CHARLES WRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant.

B181561

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. YA047954)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John V. Meigs, Judge. Affirmed as modified.

Linn Davis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Katz and Robert C. Schneider, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________

Charles Wright appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of robbery and one count of carjacking. We modify the judgment to reflect the imposition of a 10-year firearm-use enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b),[1] on count 2 for carjacking and count 3 for robbery; the imposition of two five-year enhancements under section 667, subdivision (a)(1), on each of the three counts on which Wright was convicted; and an award of 1,371 days of actual custody credit. As modified, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. The Charges

Wright was charged by information with two counts of robbery (§ 211) (counts 1 and 3) and one count of carjacking (§ 215, subd. (a)) (count 2). The information specially alleged firearm-use enhancements under section 12022.5, subdivision (a), and section 12022.53, subdivision (b), as to all counts and an additional enhancement under section 12022, subdivision (b)(2), for use of a deadly or dangerous weapon during the commission of the carjacking offense in count 2. It also specially alleged Wright was subject to sentencing under the â€

Description	Appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted defendant of two counts of robbery and one count of carjacking. Court modified the judgment to reflect the imposition of a 10-year firearm-use enhancement under Penal Code section 12022.53, subdivision (b), on count 2 for carjacking and count 3 for robbery. The imposition of two five-year enhancements under section 667, subdivision (a)(1), on each of the three counts on which Defendant was convicted and an award of 1,371 days of actual custody credit. As modified, Court affirm the judgment.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.