legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Valent U.S.A. Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty

Valent U.S.A. Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty
08:28:2006

Valent U.S.A. Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty




Filed 8/24/06 Valent U.S.A. Corp. v. Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty CA1/4






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT





DIVISION FOUR












VALENT U.S.A. CORPORATION et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


STOP HUNTINGDON ANIMAL CRUELTY, USA, INC. etc.,


Defendant and Respondent.



A110823


(Contra Costa County


Super. Ct. No. MSC04-01597)



I.


Introduction


Appellants Valent U.S.A. Corporation (Valent) and individuals Robin Demouth (Demouth) and Elsa Zisook (Zisook) (sometimes referred to collectively as â€





Description A decision regarding trespass, civil harassment under section 527.6, intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), violation of the state constitution's right to privacy, intrusion into private affairs, intentional interference with business relations, violation of this state's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) appearing at Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq. and violations of the municipal ordinances of the cities of Walnut Creek and Oakland proscribing noise and disturbances of the peace.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale