legal news


Register | Forgot Password

PEOPLE v. BRADLEY PART-I

PEOPLE v. BRADLEY PART-I
08:28:2006

PEOPLE v. BRADLEY



Filed 8/24/06




CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT




DIVISION EIGHT











THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


OMAR BRADLEY et al.,


Defendants and Appellants.



B175564


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BA 240392)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jack W. Morgan, Judge. Affirmed, as modified.


Ralph H. Goldsen for Defendant and Appellant Omar Bradley.


Richard D. Miggins for Defendant and Appellant Amen Rahh.


Tedford & Walters, Robert W. Walters, and James R. Tedford II for Defendant and Appellant John Johnson II.


Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters and Susan Sullivan Pithey, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


* * * * * *


Appellants, former high officials of the City of Compton (â€





Description In instructing jurors on definition of offenses involving misappropriation of public funds in violation of Penal Code Sec. 424, judge correctly advised that an official is guilty if he or she "appropriated public moneys, or any portion thereof, to his or her own use. Or to the use of another without authority of law" and if the defendant "loaned the same or any portion thereof, made any profit out of, or used the same for any purpose not authorized by law."
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale