P. v. Richardson
Filed 8/24/06 P. v. Richardson CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(San Joaquin)
----
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TAMEKA LATREACE RICHARDSON, Defendant and Appellant. | C052338
(Super. Ct. No. SF095888A)
|
Defendant Tameka Latreace Richardson pleaded guilty to forgery (Pen. Code, § 470, subd. (d); further undesignated statutory references are to this code) and admitted a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) with the understanding that she would receive a state prison sentence of 32 months. The trial court denied probation and sentenced defendant in accordance with the plea agreement.
Defendant appealed.
We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and, pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, requesting the court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief.
Defendant submitted a letter to this court stating she â€
