In re B.R.
Filed 8/15/06 In re B.R. CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento)
----
In re B.R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAULA R., Defendant and Appellant. |
C051395
(Super. Ct. No. JD223073)
|
Paula R. (appellant), the mother of B.R. (the minor), appeals from orders of the juvenile court adjudging the minor a dependent child of the court and removing the minor from parental custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 360, subd. (d), 395; further statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's jurisdictional findings and dispositional order of removal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On September 30, 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) filed an original juvenile dependency petition pursuant to section 300 on behalf of the seven-month-old minor. That petition alleged, pursuant to subdivision (b) of section 300, that the minor had suffered, or there was a substantial risk the minor would suffer, serious physical harm, due to the inability of appellant to provide regular care for the minor as a result of appellant's mental illness. The petition also alleged in part that appellant had â€