legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Walton

P. v. Walton
08:30:2006

P. v. Walton




Filed 8/17/06 P. v. Walton CA2/1








NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS







California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE











THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JESSE WALTON,


Defendant and Appellant.



B188461


(Super. Ct. No. BA 266246)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Ruth Ann Kwan, Judge. Affirmed.


________


Victoria H. Stafford, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


_________


On June 15, 2004, pursuant to a plea bargain, Jesse Walton pleaded guilty to selling cocaine base. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352, subd. (a).) The court imposed but stayed execution of a 4-year middle term sentence and placed Walton on probation for 3 years on condition, among others, that he obey all laws and not associate with persons he knew were drug users or sellers. After a contested hearing, the court found that Walton violated the terms of his probation by selling rock cocaine on September 14, 2005. The court imposed the 4-year prison term.


Walton appealed and we appointed counsel to represent him. After examining the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues and asking us independently to review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. On June 8, 2006, we advised Walton that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. To date we have received no response.


We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that Walton's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)


The judgment is affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


ROTHSCHILD, J.


We concur:


MALLANO, Acting P.J.


VOGEL, J.


Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.


Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line Lawyers.





Description A criminal law decision regarding selling cocaine base.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale