legal news


Register | Forgot Password

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD PART-II

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD PART-II
08:30:2006

MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD



Filed 8/17/06 (This opinion precedes companion case, S127086, also filed 8/17/06)





IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA





MICROSOFT CORPORATION, )


)


Plaintiff and Respondent, )


) S133343


v. )


) Ct.App. 1/3 A105312


FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, )


) City and County of San Francisco


Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 400444


_______________________________________ )


Continue from Part I ………



II. Section 25137: Fair Representation of Microsoft's Business Activity


A. The scope of section 25137


Our conclusion that the full redemption price constitutes gross receipts does not end matters. The UDITPA includes a relief provision for dealing with any unreasonable calculations rote application of the three-factor formula may yield. Section 25137 provides: â€





Description Redemption of marketable securities at maturity generates gross receipts that are includible in the formula used to calculate a multistate entity's tax under the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act. Where corporation's income and receipts from its short-term investments in marketable securities were extremely small in comparison with the income and receipts from the rest of its business activities, Franchise Tax Board properly used alternative UDITPA formula to determine portion of corporation's sales attributable to California as part of formula by which corporation's business income for state tax purposes is calculated.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale