legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Adriana G.

In re Adriana G.
09:06:2006

In re Adriana G.






Filed 9/5/06 In re Adriana G. CA6







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT














In re ADRIANA G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



H029584


(Santa Clara County


Super. Ct. No. JD16225)



SANTA CLARA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


GABRIELA G.,


Defendant and Appellant.




This case is a juvenile dependency action in which Gabriela G. (mother) appeals an order removing her daughter from her custody. She maintains the court committed reversible error in its handling of two Marsden[1] hearings, and during the Sara D.[2] hearing at which the court appointed a guardian ad litem.


Statement of the Facts and Case


In June 2005, mother was arrested for allegedly trying to run over Michael Roche (Rock) with her car. Her two and a half year old daughter, Adriana, was with a babysitter at the time mother was arrested. For a short period of time, Adriana stayed with her babysitter while mother was in custody. Eventually, the Department of Family and Children's Services (Department) was contacted, and Adriana was taken into protective custody.


On June 14, 2005, a petition was filed alleging that Adriana came within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g).[3] Mother was released from custody on the criminal charge on June 17, 2005.


An amended petition was filed on June 23, 2005, alleging that mother had attempted to run over â€





Description This case is a juvenile dependency action in which mother appeals an order removing her daughter from her custody. Appellant maintains the court committed reversible error in its handling of two Marsden hearings, and during the Sara D. hearing at which the court appointed a guardian ad litem.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale