legal news


Register | Forgot Password

TILTON v. RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 800

TILTON v. RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 800
09:06:2006

TILTON v. RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 800



Filed 8/15/06; pub. order 9/1/06 (see end of opn.)




IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA




FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT




DIVISION TWO












WES TILTON, as Cotrustee, etc., et al.,


Plaintiffs and Appellants,


v.


RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 800,


Defendant and Respondent.



A112185


(Contra Costa County


Super. Ct. No. C0402043)



I. INTRODUCTION


Appellants[1], the owners of two parcels of property in Contra Costa County's Discovery Bay community, filed suit against the respondent District, which had previously repaired a levee on the properties. Via two separate orders, one relating to appellants' initial complaint, and the second relating to its amended complaint, the superior court sustained demurrers to six of the seven causes of action alleged by appellants without leave to amend. It also sustained the District's demurrer to another cause of action alleged in appellants' amended complaint, albeit with leave to amend. Appellants opted not to amend their complaint, instead dismissing it with prejudice. Appellants appeal, contending the trial court was incorrect in the legal bases upon which it sustained, without leave to amend, the District's demurrers to its six causes of action. They also appeal from the trial court's order granting special demurrers and a motion to strike filed by the District. We shall affirm the judgment of dismissal.


II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND


As noted, appellants, as Trustees of the Tilton Family Trust, are the owners of two residences and parcels built on an â€





Description The district sued alleging improper repaired of levee underlying their property, trial court properly sustained district's demurrers without leave to amend as to taking causes of action, plaintiffs pled guilty only to standard allegations of inadequate maintenance rather than a faulty plan involving the design, construction, and maintenance of a levee, it is not an adequate basis for an inverse condemnation claim; and as a tort causes of action, plaintiffs failed to plead that the district was under a mandatory duty to prevent leakage of its levees within the meaning of Government Code Sec. 815.6's exception to the general governmental immunity provision.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale