P. v. Gonzales CA2/6
mk's Membership Status
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09
Biographical Information
Contact Information
Submission History
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3
Find all listings submitted by mk
By mk
05:27:2017
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CAMILLO GONZALES,
Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B277522
(Super. Ct. No. PA083698-01)
(Los Angeles County)
Camillo Gonzales appeals a judgment following his guilty plea to arson (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (d)) and his subsequent admission that he violated his probation conditions.
We appointed counsel to represent Gonzales on this appeal. After examination of the record, his counsel filed an opening brief requesting the court to make an independent review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
On March 2, 2017, we sent Gonzales a letter advising him of his right to file a supplemental brief. That letter was returned in the mail with the notation “unable to forward.” Counsel has filed a declaration and states that he informed Gonzales of his right to file a supplemental brief. As of this date, Gonzales has not filed a supplemental brief.
After examination of the record, we are satisfied that Gonzales’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441, 443.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
GILBERT, P. J.
We concur:
YEGAN, J.
PERREN, J.
Cynthia L. Ulfig, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
David Blake Chatfield, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Description | Camillo Gonzales appeals a judgment following his guilty plea to arson (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (d)) and his subsequent admission that he violated his probation conditions. We appointed counsel to represent Gonzales on this appeal. After examination of the record, his counsel filed an opening brief requesting the court to make an independent review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. |
Rating | |
Views | 11 views. Averaging 11 views per day. |