Filed 4/11/17 P. v. Thompson CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO



THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TERRILL TRAMAINE THOMPSON,

Defendant and Appellant.


E066753

(Super.Ct.No. 16CR039234)

OPINION


APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Colin J. Bilash, Judge. Affirmed.
Helen S. Irza, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 9, 2016, a felony complaint charged defendant and appellant Terrill Tramaine Thompson with one count of making criminal threats in violation of Penal Code section 422, subdivision (a).
On August 17, 2016, defendant pled guilty to count 1 in exchange for a stipulated sentence of 16 months, pursuant to a plea agreement. Defendant signed an appeal waiver as part of the plea agreement.
According to the police report, on the evening of August 7, 2016, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Deputy Josh Gile was called to the scene of a possible domestic dispute at a mobile home park in Loma, Linda, California. Upon arrival, Deputy Gile made contact with defendant. The deputy asked defendant if he was the person referenced in the dispatch call who had been making criminal threats. Defendant said “yes.” He then stated that he had threatened to kill his girlfriend during a heated argument because he believed she was out to get him. Deputy Gile detained defendant after a record check revealed an active misdemeanor warrant for defendant’s arrest.
At a hearing on August 17, 2016, the trial court sentenced defendant to 16 months in state prison in accordance with the plea agreement. A related misdemeanor charge was also dismissed.
On August 31, 2016, defendant filed his timely notice of appeal. On September 9, 2016, defendant filed an amended notice of appeal. In the amended notice, defendant stated that his appeal “is based on the sentence or other matters occurring after the plea.” Defendant neither challenged the validity of his plea nor requested a certificate of probable cause.
DISCUSSION
After defendant appealed, and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.
We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no error.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


MILLER
J.


We concur:


HOLLENHORST
Acting. P. J.


McKINSTER
J.