legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Butler CA5

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Butler CA5
By
07:06:2017

Filed 5/11/17 P. v. Butler CA5










NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

OMARI BUTLER,

Defendant and Appellant.


F072587

(Super. Ct. No. F15902510)


OPINION

THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County.
David Andrew Gottlieb, Judge.
Allan E. Junker, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appointed counsel for defendant Omari Butler asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Finding no arguable issues, we affirm.
We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On April 21, 2015, defendant committed acts of violence against the mother of his son.
On July 8, 2015, defendant was convicted by no contest plea of criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422) and misdemeanor corporal injury to a cohabitant (§ 273.5, subd. (f)(1)). He admitted having suffered a prior conviction for domestic violence.
On September 1, 2015, the trial court sentenced defendant to the low term of 16 months in prison on the section 422 count and 268 days in jail on the misdemeanor count. The court awarded defendant 268 days of credit. The court ordered defendant to pay a $600 restitution fine (§ 1202.4), a suspended $600 parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45), an $80 court security fee (§ 1465.8), and a criminal conviction assessment of $60 (Gov. Code, § 70373). The court also issued a five-year criminal protective order (§§ 136.2, subd. (i)(1), 273.5, subd. (j)).
On October 26, 2015, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
We have reviewed the record and have found no arguable issues on appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.




Description Appointed counsel for defendant Omari Butler asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Finding no arguable issues, we affirm.
We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On April 21, 2015, defendant committed acts of violence against the mother of his son.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 12 views. Averaging 12 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale