P. v. Pulido
Filed 3/15/06 P. v. Pulido CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALFREDO PULIDO, Defendant and Appellant. | G035685 (Super. Ct. No. 04SF0233) O P I N I O N |
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Pamela L. Iles, Judge. Affirmed.
Jennevee H. De Guzman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
* * *
We appointed counsel to represent Alfredo Pulido on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the facts of the case. Counsel did not argue against her client, but advised the court no issues were found to argue on his behalf. We invited Pulido to file a supplemental brief which he did. We have examined the record as well as Pulido's supplemental brief and found no arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436.)
The judgment is affirmed.
O'LEARY, J.
WE CONCUR:
BEDSWORTH, ACTING P. J.
IKOLA, J.
Publication courtesy of Ramona minimum wages lawyer( http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/ )and Ramona lawyers directory( http://www.fearnotlaw.com/)
