Filed 7/18/17 P. v. Alfaro CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

AURELIO ALFARO,

Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B279065
(Super. Ct. No. 2016019926)
(Ventura County)

Aurelio Alfaro appeals the judgment following conviction by jury of evading a police officer while driving recklessly (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)), hit and run with property damage (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a)), and resisting, delaying or obstructing a police officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)). The trial court sentenced him to 196 days in county jail with credit for time served, and formal probation for three years.
Appellant was driving his mother’s car when a sheriff’s deputy attempted a traffic stop by turning on his overhead lights and activating his siren. Instead of stopping, appellant accelerated to 60 mph in a 40 mph zone, ran a stop sign, spun his vehicle in a fishtailing 400 degree turn, and ran a red light at 75 mph. Appellant escaped but crashed the car in front of a house, causing property damage, then fled on foot.
The next day, sheriff’s deputies spotted appellant on a bicycle and again attempted a traffic stop by telling him to stop and activating overhead lights and sirens. Appellant rode away from multiple deputies chasing him but was caught after an extended chase and arrested.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant on this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues. On May 16, 2017, we advised appellant by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.


YEGAN, J.
Gilbert A. Romero, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Deidre K. Smith, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.