P. v. Lopez

Filed 10/3/06 P. v. Lopez CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H029774

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Monterey County

Superior Court

v. Nos. SS040855, SS032783)

LEVI G. LOPEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

_____________________________________/

Defendant was convicted of carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a)), active participation in a criminal street gang (Pen. Code, § 186.22, subd. (a)), attempting to dissuade a witness (Pen. Code, § 136.1, subd. (a)(2)), and possession of a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)). Defendant also admitted the truth of a gang enhancement allegation. (Pen. Code, §186.22, subd. (b)(1).) He was sentenced to 23 years in state prison and filed a timely notice of appeal. Appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no issues. Defendant was notified of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf but has failed to avail himself of the opportunity. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there are no arguable issues on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

_______________________________

Mihara, J.

WE CONCUR:

_____________________________

Bamattre-Manoukian, Acting P.J.

_____________________________

McAdams, J.

Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.

Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line attorney.

Description	Defendant was convicted of carjacking, active participation in a criminal street gang, attempting to dissuade a witness, and possession of a deadly weapon. Defendant also admitted the truth of a gang enhancement allegation. Defendant was sentenced to 23 years in state prison and filed a timely notice of appeal. Appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no issues. Defendant was notified of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf but has failed to avail himself of the opportunity. The court reviewed the entire record and concluded that there are no arguable issues on appeal.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.