legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Mullin CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Mullin CA2/6
By
11:21:2017

Filed 9/20/17 P. v. Mullin CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MICHELLE ELAINE MULLIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B281644

(Super. Ct. No. 2016030899)

(Ventura County)

Michelle Elaine Mullin appeals from the judgment imposed after the trial court found her in violation of probation and sentenced her to county jail. (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (b).)

Mullin pled no contest to leaving the scene of an accident. (Veh. Code, § 20001, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on formal probation. The court also ordered her to stay away from three people named in a protective order. Mullin’s probation officer subsequently alleged that she made contact with two of those people. The court found Mullin in violation of the protective order, revoked probation, and sentenced her to county jail.

We appointed counsel to represent Mullin in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On July 20, 2017, we advised Mullin by mail that she had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues she wished us to consider. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Mullin’s attorney fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

YEGAN, J.

Michael Lief, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Sylvia Eva Ronnau, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.





Description Michelle Elaine Mullin appeals from the judgment imposed after the trial court found her in violation of probation and sentenced her to county jail. (Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (b).)
Mullin pled no contest to leaving the scene of an accident. (Veh. Code, § 20001, subd. (a).) The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed her on formal probation. The court also ordered her to stay away from three people named in a protective order. Mullin’s probation officer subsequently alleged that she made contact with two of those people. The court found Mullin in violation of the protective order, revoked probation, and sentenced her to county jail.
Rating
1/5 based on 1 vote.
Views 22 views. Averaging 22 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale