legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Garcia CA4/2

abundy's Membership Status

Registration Date: Jun 01, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 06:01:2017 - 11:31:27

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
In re K.P. CA6
P. v. Price CA6
P. v. Alvarez CA6
P. v. Shaw CA6
Marriage of Lejerskar CA4/3

Find all listings submitted by abundy
P. v. Garcia CA4/2
By
01:16:2018

Filed 11/16/17 P. v. Garcia CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO



THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

CARLOS GARCIA,

Defendant and Appellant.


E067971

(Super.Ct.No. RIF1604189)

O P I N I O N


APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Thomas Kelly, Judge. (Retired judge of the Santa Cruz Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.
Donna L. Harris, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


Defendant and appellant, Carlos Garcia, pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine for sale (count 1; Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and possession of drug paraphernalia (count 2; Health & Saf. Code, § 11364). Defendant additionally admitted he had suffered two prior prison terms (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) and a prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)). The court sentenced defendant to four years of incarceration, as indicated.
After defendant filed two notices of appeal, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case and identifying one potentially arguable issue: whether the court erred in denying defendant’s request to relieve the public defender and appoint new counsel. We affirm.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On August 26, 2016, the People charged defendant by felony complaint with possession of methamphetamine for sale (count 1; Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), possession of drug paraphernalia (count 2; Health & Saf. Code, § 11364), and possession of burglary tools (count 3; Pen. Code, § 466). The People additionally alleged defendant had suffered two prior prison terms (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) and one prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)).
On January 6, 2017, the court denied defendant’s Marsden request after holding a hearing on the motion. On January 27, 2017, defendant made, but then withdrew, a request to represent himself.
On February 6, 2017, the People moved to dismiss count 3 for insufficient evidence, which the court granted. In a plea to the court, defendant pled guilty to the counts 1 and 2 offenses and admitted he had suffered two prior prison terms and a prior strike conviction. The court then sentenced defendant to the indicated, aggregate term of four years of incarceration. The court stayed imposition of the two prior prison terms.
On August 17, 2017, defendant’s counsel filed a motion for correction of sentencing requesting that the court strike, rather than stay punishment on, the two prior prison term enhancements. On the same date, the court granted the request. On August 22, 2017, the court issued a corrected abstract of judgment reflecting the change.
II. DISCUSSION
We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.
III. DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER
J.


We concur:

RAMIREZ
P. J.

MILLER
J.





Description Defendant and appellant, Carlos Garcia, pled guilty to possession of methamphetamine for sale (count 1; Health & Saf. Code, § 11378) and possession of drug paraphernalia (count 2; Health & Saf. Code, § 11364). Defendant additionally admitted he had suffered two prior prison terms (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) and a prior strike conviction (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(1), 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)). The court sentenced defendant to four years of incarceration, as indicated.
After defendant filed two notices of appeal, this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case and identifying one potentially arguable issue: whether the court erred in denying defendant’s request to relieve the public defender and appoint new counsel. We affirm.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 21 views. Averaging 21 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale