In re A.C. CA2/6
abundy's Membership Status
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 06:01:2017 - 11:31:27
Biographical Information
Contact Information
Submission History
In re K.P. CA6
P. v. Price CA6
P. v. Alvarez CA6
P. v. Shaw CA6
Marriage of Lejerskar CA4/3
Find all listings submitted by abundy
By nbuttres
02:06:2018
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
In re A.C., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
2d Juv. No. B282690
(Super. Ct. No. FJ54673)
(Los Angeles County)
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
A.C.,
Defendant and Appellant.
A.C., a minor, appeals from the judgment entered after the juvenile court sustained a petition for felony shooting at an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, § 246) and declared appellant a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602.) The petition was sustained based on evidence that appellant fired three or four shots at the victim’s house. The trial court declared the maximum period confinement to be seven years, removed appellant from the physical custody of his parents, and committed appellant to the care and custody of the probation department for purposes of placement in a five-to-seven-month camp-community program. Appellant was awarded 33 days predisposition custody credit.
We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On October 10, 2017, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; In re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97, 118-119.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, Acting P. J.
We concur:
PERREN, J.
TANGEMAN, J.
Christina L. Hill, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Bruce G. Finebaum, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance by Respondent.
| Description | A.C., a minor, appeals from the judgment entered after the juvenile court sustained a petition for felony shooting at an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, § 246) and declared appellant a ward of the court. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602.) The petition was sustained based on evidence that appellant fired three or four shots at the victim’s house. The trial court declared the maximum period confinement to be seven years, removed appellant from the physical custody of his parents, and committed appellant to the care and custody of the probation department for purposes of placement in a five-to-seven-month camp-community program. Appellant was awarded 33 days predisposition custody credit. On October 10, 2017, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date. |
| Rating | |
| Views | 5 views. Averaging 5 views per day. |
