legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Willis CA5

abundy's Membership Status

Registration Date: Jun 01, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 06:01:2017 - 11:31:27

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
In re K.P. CA6
P. v. Price CA6
P. v. Alvarez CA6
P. v. Shaw CA6
Marriage of Lejerskar CA4/3

Find all listings submitted by abundy
P. v. Willis CA5
By
02:12:2018

Filed 12/13/17 P. v. Willis CA5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

SARAH LAVENIA WILLIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

F074664

(Super. Ct. Nos. BF164910A & BF161610A)


OPINION

THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Michael G. Bush, Judge.
Elizabeth Campbell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-


Appointed counsel for defendant Sarah Lavenia Willis asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising her of her right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. The letter was returned and marked as not forwardable. On review, we find no arguable issues.
We provide the following brief description of the procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On September 22, 2015, in case No. 1, defendant was charged with unauthorized use of personal identifying information (Pen. Code, § 530.5, subd. (a)), and three prior prison terms were alleged (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
On April 27, 2016, in case No. 1, defendant pled no contest to the single charge and admitted having served one prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), in exchange for a four-year term. As with the prior hearings, defendant was released on bail.
On May 25, 2016, defendant failed to appear for the sentencing hearing in case No. 1, and a warrant was issued for her arrest.
On July 20, 2016, while defendant was released on bail, she was charged in case No. 2 with failing to appear in case No. 1 (§ 1320.5, a felony), and three prior prison terms were alleged (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
On September 8, 2016, in case No. 1, the trial court sentenced defendant to a split sentence of four years, the first year to be served in jail and the remainder under mandatory supervision. The court imposed various fines and fees.
On September 20, 2016, in case No. 2, defendant pled no contest to failing to appear, in exchange for a two-year jail term to be served concurrently to the term in case No. 1. The court imposed the two-year term, as agreed, and imposed various fines and fees.
On November 4, 2016, defendant filed a notice of appeal. Her request for a certificate of probable cause was denied.
After a review of the entire record, we see no arguable errors on appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.






Description Appointed counsel for defendant Sarah Lavenia Willis asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We sent a letter to defendant, advising her of her right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. The letter was returned and marked as not forwardable. On review, we find no arguable issues.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 6 views. Averaging 6 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale