legal news


Register | Forgot Password

STATE v. GENE MCBEE

STATE v. GENE MCBEE
03:18:2006

STATE v. GENE MCBEE


FILED: March 15, 2006


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON


STATE OF OREGON,


Respondent,


v.


DONALD GENE MCBEE,


Appellant.


CR0102586; A124484


Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.


Eve Miller, Judge.


Submitted on record and briefs December 2, 2005.


Jay Edwards filed the brief for appellant.


Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Kaye E. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Before Haselton, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Rosenblum, Judges.


PER CURIAM


Sentences vacated and remanded with instructions to recalculate restitution; otherwise affirmed.


PER CURIAM


Defendant was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, ORS 164.135, and possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b), and received probationary sentences on each count. On the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle conviction, the trial court imposed restitution in the amount of $1,673.50. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred in imposing restitution for damage to the stolen vehicle, as the evidence at sentencing indicated that another individual had caused the damage before defendant came into possession of it. The state concedes that it failed to establish a causal connection between defendant's conduct and the damage to the vehicle, and that restitution for damage to the vehicle therefore was not properly imposed in this instance. See generally State v. Edson, 329 Or 127, 985 P2d 1253 (1999). The state notes, however, that the trial court properly could impose restitution for towing and storage fees. We agree with defendant that the trial court erred in imposing restitution for damage to the vehicle. We further agree with the state that restitution for towing and storage fees was properly imposed, but we are unable to determine how much of the total amount awarded was for those purposes.


Sentences vacated and remanded with instructions to recalculate restitution; otherwise affirmed.


Publication courtesy of San Diego Employment attorney ( http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/ ) And San Diego Lawyers Directory ( http://www.fearnotlaw.com/ )





Description A decision regarding possession of a controlled sustance.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale