legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lewis CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Lewis CA2/6
By
05:18:2018

Filed 5/15/18 P. v. Lewis CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KURT LEE LEWIS,

Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B286365
(Super. Ct. No. 1502683)
(Santa Barbara County)

A jury found Kurt Lee Lewis guilty of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)), and possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Lewis on five years’ probation with terms and conditions, including that he serve 180 days in county jail.
In August 2016, a man discovered that property was missing from the tool shop he rented. Sheriff’s deputies responded and set up motion-activated cameras around the shop. The cameras showed Lewis inside.
Deputies went to Lewis’s home. They found ammunition in his bedroom and stolen tools in his garage. Lewis admitted he entered the tool shop, but denied taking any tools. He claimed his codefendant took the tools and left them in his garage.
We appointed counsel to represent Lewis in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. On March 16, 2018, we advised Lewis by mail that he had 30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Lewis’s attorney fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


TANGEMAN, J.
We concur:


YEGAN, Acting P. J.


PERREN, J.
John F. McGregor, Judge

Superior Court County of Santa Barbara

______________________________


Patricia Ann Dark, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.




Description A jury found Kurt Lee Lewis guilty of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)), and possession of ammunition by a felon (§ 30305, subd. (a)(1)). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Lewis on five years’ probation with terms and conditions, including that he serve 180 days in county jail.
In August 2016, a man discovered that property was missing from the tool shop he rented. Sheriff’s deputies responded and set up motion-activated cameras around the shop. The cameras showed Lewis inside.
Deputies went to Lewis’s home. They found ammunition in his bedroom and stolen tools in his garage. Lewis admitted he entered the tool shop, but denied taking any tools. He claimed his codefendant took the tools and left them in his garage.
We appointed counsel to represent Lewis in this appeal. After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 9 views. Averaging 9 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale