Filed 5/21/18 P. v. Hernandez CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX


THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MATTHEW ALLEN HERNANDEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No.B285234
(Super. Ct. Nos. 2015027932, 2015038003, 2017010151, 2017014138)
(Ventura County)

Matthew Allen Hernandez pled guilty to two counts of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and admitted to five prior prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced Hernandez to 16 months on one burglary and eight months on the other to run consecutively. The court struck two of the prior prison term enhancements and added a consecutive three years for the remaining three enhancements. The sentence was divided between three years in custody and two years mandatory supervision.
While serving that sentence, Hernandez pled guilty in two additional cases. In one case, he pled guilty to resisting an executive officer (§ 69) and battery on an officer (§ 243, subd. (b)). In the other case, he pled guilty to battery on a police officer with injury (id., subd. (c)(2)); resisting an executive officer (§ 69); and two counts of resisting a police officer (§ 148). The trial court revoked Hernandez’s mandatory supervision and sentenced him to 16 additional months in prison.
Hernandez appeals the sentences.
We appointed counsel to represent Hernandez in this appeal. After examining the record, he filed a brief raising no issues.
On January 23, 2018, we advised Hernandez by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We received no reply.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Hernandez’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


GILBERT, P. J.
We concur:

PERREN, J.

TANGEMAN, J.

Charles W. Campbell, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________


Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.