NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
JOSEPH SCOTT STONE,
Defendant and Appellant.
|
F076491
(Super. Ct. No. BF168897A)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Colette M. Humphrey, Judge.
Jared G. Coleman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appointed counsel for defendant Joseph Scott Stone asked this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant, we affirm.
We provide the following brief description of the factual and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)
On July 1, 2017, defendant attempted by means of threat or violence to deter or prevent a sheriff’s deputy from performing his duty.
On July 18, 2017, defendant pled no contest to resisting an officer (Pen. Code, § 69), and admitted having suffered a prior felony conviction within the meaning of the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), in return for a four-year term.
On September 18, 2017, the trial court sentenced defendant to two years in prison, doubled to four years pursuant to the Three Strikes law. The court awarded credits and imposed various fines and fees.
On October 25, 2017, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
* Before, Poochigian Acting P.J., Detjen, J. and Snauffer, J.
