legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Kelly CA3

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Kelly CA3
By
12:20:2018

Filed 10/11/18 P. v. Kelly CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOHN HENRY KELLY,

Defendant and Appellant.

C086455

(Super. Ct. No. CRF171546)

In August 2017, defendant John Henry Kelly was driving a Honda with a value over $951 without the permission of the owner and with the intent to deny the owner possession of the vehicle. At the time, he had three prior felony convictions for unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle. He pled no contest to felony unlawful driving or taking a vehicle with the intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner, with a previous conviction.

In accordance with the plea, the trial court sentenced defendant to a term of four years in county jail with no mandatory supervision, ordered him to pay direct victim restitution of $350, a restitution fine of $300, a $40 court security fee, a $30 conviction assessment, and granted him 116 days of presentence custody credits.

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record pursuant to Wende, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/s/

Robie, J.

We concur:

/s/

Blease, Acting P. J.

/s/

Butz, J.





Description In August 2017, defendant John Henry Kelly was driving a Honda with a value over $951 without the permission of the owner and with the intent to deny the owner possession of the vehicle. At the time, he had three prior felony convictions for unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle. He pled no contest to felony unlawful driving or taking a vehicle with the intent to permanently or temporarily deprive the owner, with a previous conviction.
In accordance with the plea, the trial court sentenced defendant to a term of four years in county jail with no mandatory supervision, ordered him to pay direct victim restitution of $350, a restitution fine of $300, a $40 court security fee, a $30 conviction assessment, and granted him 116 days of presentence custody credits.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 5 views. Averaging 5 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale