legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Javier

P. v. Javier
11:08:2006

P. v. Javier




Filed 10/11/06 P. v. Javier CA4/2







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION TWO











THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


JAVIER EDUARDO JAVIER,


Defendant and Appellant.



E039473


(Super.Ct.Nos. SWF012306 &


SWF012503)


OPINION



APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Martin W. Staven, Judge. (Retired judge of the Tulare Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.


Neil Auwarter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


In case No. SWF012306, defendant pled guilty to stalking (Pen. Code, § 646.9, subd. (b)), making criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422), and obstructing a police officer with violence or threats. (Pen. Code, §69.) He was sentenced to the agreed-to term of two years in prison.


In case No. SWF012503, defendant pled guilty to arson. (Pen. Code, § 451, subd. (c).) He was sentenced to local time, which was run concurrently with his prison sentence in the case mentioned above.


There is no certificate of probable cause in the record before this court.


Defendant appealed, and upon his request this court appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 [87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493] setting forth a statement of the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues and requesting this court to undertake a review of the entire record.


We offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which he has not done.


We have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.


DISPOSITION


The judgments are affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


/s/ RAMIREZ


P.J.


We concur:


/s/ McKINSTER


J.


/s/ MILLER


J.


Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.


Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.





Description In case No. SWF012306, defendant pled guilty to stalking, making criminal threats, and obstructing a police officer with violence or threats. Defendant was sentenced to the agreed-to term of two years in prison. In case No. SWF012503, defendant pled guilty to arson. Defendant was sentenced to local time, which was run concurrently with his prison sentence in the case mentioned above. There is no certificate of probable cause in the record before this court.
Defendant appealed requesting the court to undertake a review of the entire record. Court concluded the independent review of the record and found no arguable issues.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale