legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rodabaugh CA2/6

mk's Membership Status

Registration Date: May 18, 2017
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 05:23:2018 - 13:04:09

Biographical Information

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Mendieta CA4/1
Asselin-Normand v. America Best Value Inn CA3
In re C.B. CA3
P. v. Bamford CA3
P. v. Jones CA3

Find all listings submitted by mk
P. v. Rodabaugh CA2/6
By
12:24:2018

Filed 11/7/18 P. v. Rodabaugh CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DALE STEPHEN RODABAUGH,

Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B290358

(Super. Ct. No. CR21412)

(Ventura County)

Dale Stephen Rodabaugh appeals from an order denying a petition to reduce his felony conviction to a misdemeanor under Penal Code[1] section 1170.18 (Proposition 47).

In 1986, Rodabaugh pled guilty to forgery of a credit card application (§ 470). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Rodabaugh on probation.

In March 2018, Rodabaugh filed an application to have the forgery charge reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to Proposition 47. The trial court denied the petition finding that (1) he did not show that the value of the credit card was $950 or less; (2) he posed an unreasonable risk to public safety; and (3) forgery of a credit card application does not fall within Proposition 47’s provisions.

We appointed counsel to represent Rodabaugh in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, he filed an opening brief raising no arguable issues. On September 18, 2018, we advised Rodabaugh that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contention or issues that he wished us to consider. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Rodabaugh’s counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.

F. Dino Inumerable, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

______________________________

Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.


[1] Further unspecified statutory references are to the Penal Code.





Description In 1986, Rodabaugh pled guilty to forgery of a credit card application (§ 470). The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Rodabaugh on probation.
In March 2018, Rodabaugh filed an application to have the forgery charge reduced to a misdemeanor pursuant to Proposition 47. The trial court denied the petition finding that (1) he did not show that the value of the credit card was $950 or less; (2) he posed an unreasonable risk to public safety; and (3) forgery of a credit card application does not fall within Proposition 47’s provisions.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 7 views. Averaging 7 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale