Shelden v. Grossman
Filed 10/11/06 Shelden v. Grossman CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
| ORLYNN DEON SHELDEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. N. MATTHEW GROSSMAN, et al., Defendants and Respondents. | B184270 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC241152) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT |
THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that the unpublished opinion filed herein on October 3, 2006, be modified as follows:
1. On page 2, the second and third sentences of the third paragraph, beginning with “After her mother’s death,” are replaced with the following: “Her estate passed by the terms of her will largely to Donald. In 1993, in consideration of Donald’s payment to her of $510,000, Lindy executed a release of all claims as to Donald and his attorneys pertaining to her mother’s estate.”
2. On page 9, the second sentence of the first full paragraph is modified as follows: “In a settlement agreement resolving the litigation over her mother’s estate” is replaced by “In the release she signed in 1993,” and the phrase “the alleged” is replaced by “any.”
3. On page 9, the third sentence of the first full paragraph is modified as follows: “As consideration for the settlement of the lawsuit” is replaced by “In that release.”
These modifications effect no change in the judgment.
________________________________________________________________________
PERLUSS, P.J. JOHNSON, J. ZELON, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line Lawyers.
